The Illusion of Wealth & How to Beat Inflation: A 100-Year Perspective
We tested 30 ideas about how to beat inflation against 100 years of US money supply data, from gold and housing to savings, the S&P 500 and Bitcoin.
Topic
Most inflation figures you see are CPI, which tracks the price of a basket of goods, but our research measures something underneath that: how fast the US money supply itself grows.
Over the past century M2 went from $43.7 billion to $22.8 trillion, an average of 6.56% a year, and we treat that as the hurdle an investment has to beat just to keep its share of the money pool.
Seen that way, a lot of familiar results change. Savings earning the long-run average of 3.4% lost about 95% of their purchasing power over 100 years, US house prices lost about 83% relative to M2 and even the S&P 500 on price came in slightly behind. The four articles under this topic go through it in order, and if you want to try the numbers on your own savings, the calculators on our inflation tracker do the same sum.
4 articles from our research on this topic.
We tested 30 ideas about how to beat inflation against 100 years of US money supply data, from gold and housing to savings, the S&P 500 and Bitcoin.
Historical asset class returns since 1928 for nine investments, from small caps to T-bills, and why only three of them grew faster than the money supply.
We test whether the stock market beats inflation once money printing counts, using the S&P 500's 468x rise since 1926 and savings that fell to 4.3 cents.
Gold rose 168x and US house prices 83x after 1926, while the money supply grew 503x. We compare gold vs real estate returns to see which kept its value.
Answers drawn from the figures in our research. Educational only, not financial advice.
Because CPI answers a different question from ours. It tracks what a basket of shopping costs, and when we started on the series we wanted to know whether an asset had grown in value or had been carried along by new money, and for that we needed the money itself.
M2 went from $43.7 billion in 1926 to $22.8 trillion, so a dollar from 1926 now stands for less than one-fifth of a cent of the total pool, and $100 put away in 1928 had to become about $47,300 just to hold its share. Once we saw those numbers we stopped treating CPI as the bar, because an investment can keep pace with it and still lose ground against the money pool.
On our measure, about 6.56% a year, compounded and never withdrawn, since that is the average annual growth of US M2 over the last century. We used the 3-month T-bill in Part II as a stand-in for the best safe savings rate, and it averaged 3.17% against M2 growth of 6.66%, a gap of 3.48% a year that compounded for a hundred years, so $1 saved in 1926 with all its interest reinvested was worth 4.3 cents in M2 terms by 2025.
Savings at the long-run average of 3.4% fell short too. The assets that cleared the bar mostly did it by reinvesting their income: the S&P 500 with dividends, real estate with rent reinvested at about 9.3% a year, farmland at a similar rate and Baa corporate bonds, which only just made it at 6.4%.
Sources