The Illusion of Wealth & How to Beat Inflation: A 100-Year Perspective
We tested 30 ideas about how to beat inflation against 100 years of US money supply data, from gold and housing to savings, the S&P 500 and Bitcoin.
Topic
Nvidia is our clearest example of how much faster wealth can compound in the digital age.
Since its 1999 listing the shares have grown 4,190-fold, and after taking out the growth in the US money supply that is still an 836x gain in purchasing power, which took Berkshire Hathaway and Walmart 55 to 60 years to get close to.
We cover it in the overview, in Part V on crypto and tech, and in Part VI, where we compare today’s AI boom with the dot-com peak. When we looked at the fundamentals, the gap was large: Cisco traded near 200 times earnings on about $18 billion of revenue in 2000, while Nvidia in mid-2026 had projected FY2027 revenue of around $367 billion and net margins above 60%.
3 articles from our research on this topic.
We tested 30 ideas about how to beat inflation against 100 years of US money supply data, from gold and housing to savings, the S&P 500 and Bitcoin.
Our base-case Nvidia stock prediction and gold price forecast for 2030 and 2035, alongside Bitcoin and the Nasdaq, all modelled against money supply growth.
We measure Bitcoin, Nvidia, Apple and the Nasdaq against money supply growth to settle crypto vs stocks, and to see how much faster tech built real wealth.
Answers drawn from the figures in our research. Educational only, not financial advice.
Better than any other share in Part V. From 1999 to 2026 Nvidia grew 4,190x nominally, which comes to 836x once the growth in M2 is taken out, at a compound rate of 36.2% a year. For context, Apple managed 489x from 1985 and Microsoft 474x from 1986. The COVID period shows the same thing at a smaller scale: from January 2019 Nvidia rose 44.5x while M2 grew 1.52x, far too wide a gap for new money alone to explain.
We don’t think the comparison holds on the numbers we looked at. Cisco at its 2000 peak was valued above $500 billion on roughly $18 billion of revenue, and many dot-com companies had no earnings at all. Nvidia in mid-2026 trades on a forward P/E in the mid-20s with large real cash flows, so the risk we see is slowing growth rather than a business with nothing underneath it. Part VI goes through why we expect that growth to slow, and what our base case of $580 by 2030 assumes.
Important information
Capital at risk. The value of investments can fall as well as rise and you may get back less than you invest. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Educational information only, not financial advice. Read our disclaimer.
Sources